Trump's Nobel Prize Letter Sparks 25th Amendment Calls from Cheney's Doctor
A prominent physician who once treated former Vice President Dick Cheney has issued a stark call for a congressional investigation into Donald Trump's mental fitness. This demand follows the revelation of what has been described as an "extraordinary letter" from the former president to Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere.
Content of the Controversial Correspondence
In the letter, Trump reportedly expressed that he "no longer feels an obligation to think purely of peace." This statement appears directly linked to his being overlooked for the Nobel Peace Prize, a slight that has evidently provoked a significant and concerning response from the former commander-in-chief. The correspondence, which sources indicate Trump directed to be distributed to other European nations, has raised serious alarms about his state of mind and diplomatic judgement.
Medical Professional Sounds the Alarm
Dr. Jonathan Reiner, the cardiologist known for his role in treating Dick Cheney, has publicly suggested that this letter should trigger a formal, bipartisan congressional inquiry into presidential fitness. His intervention carries considerable weight given his medical expertise and previous high-level patient care. Dr. Reiner's call adds a clinical dimension to the growing political concerns surrounding Trump's behaviour and decision-making processes.
Renewed Political Pressure for Constitutional Action
This development has reignited discussions about the potential invocation of the 25th Amendment. Several Democratic politicians, including Representative Yassamin Ansari, Senator Ed Markey, and Representative Eric Swalwell, have previously called for such action following Trump's recent threats regarding Greenland. The amendment, a constitutional mechanism for addressing presidential incapacity, would require Vice President JD Vance and a majority of Trump's Cabinet to formally declare the president unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.
The Broader Implications for US Diplomacy
The letter to Norway's leader represents more than a personal grievance; it signals a potential shift in US foreign policy rhetoric under a possible future Trump administration. The suggestion that peace is no longer a primary obligation is a stark departure from traditional diplomatic postures and has profound implications for international relations. This incident, coupled with the Greenland remarks, paints a picture of a leadership style that allies may find unpredictable and concerning.
As the story develops, the combination of medical professional concern and political pressure creates a potent challenge. The calls for investigation underscore deepening anxieties about stability and judgement at the highest levels of American power, with the 25th Amendment looming as a constitutional recourse should these fears be substantiated through official inquiry.
