In a compelling episode of The Guardian’s Full Story podcast, analysts delve into a provocative question: Can Donald Trump be shamed into supporting human rights? The discussion unpacks the former US president’s track record and examines whether public pressure or moral appeals might alter his stance.
The Power of Public Shame in Politics
Historically, public figures have sometimes shifted positions under intense scrutiny. However, Trump’s tenure suggests a resistance to traditional accountability measures. Experts debate whether his approach to human rights—often criticised as transactional—could ever be swayed by ethical arguments alone.
Key Takeaways from the Podcast
- Transactional Diplomacy: Trump’s policy decisions often prioritised deals over ideals, raising doubts about moral persuasion.
- Media Influence: While Trump thrives on attention, it’s unclear whether negative coverage impacts his policy choices.
- Base Loyalty: His core supporters rarely penalise him for controversial stances, reducing the incentive to change.
What This Means for Global Human Rights
If shame proves ineffective, the podcast suggests alternative strategies—such as leveraging economic or political incentives—to advance human rights agendas with leaders like Trump. The episode leaves listeners pondering: When principles fail, what tools remain?
