
Former US National Security Adviser John Bolton has made explosive allegations against ex-Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard, accusing her of committing 'treason' and suggesting that former President Barack Obama was aware of her actions.
Bolton, known for his hawkish foreign policy views, made the claims in a recent interview, though he provided no concrete evidence to support his accusations. The remarks have ignited a fierce debate, with critics dismissing them as baseless and politically motivated.
What Did Bolton Say?
Bolton alleged that Gabbard, a former Hawaii congresswoman and military veteran, engaged in activities that amounted to treason during her political career. He further insinuated that Obama, under whom she served, was aware of these actions but failed to act.
"There are serious questions about Tulsi Gabbard's loyalty to the United States," Bolton stated. "Her behaviour raises red flags, and it's troubling that this wasn't addressed at the highest levels."
Gabbard's Response
Gabbard, who has often positioned herself as a critic of US interventionist policies, swiftly denied the allegations. In a statement, her spokesperson called Bolton's claims "outrageous and completely false," adding that they were an attempt to smear her reputation.
"Congresswoman Gabbard has always served her country with honour, both in uniform and in public office," the statement read. "These accusations are nothing more than a desperate political attack."
Political Fallout
The controversy has drawn reactions from across the political spectrum. Some conservative figures have echoed Bolton's concerns, while progressive voices have dismissed the allegations as a distraction from more pressing issues.
Analysts suggest that Bolton's comments may be aimed at undermining Gabbard's influence, particularly as she has been increasingly vocal in criticising both major US political parties.
As the story develops, questions remain about whether Bolton will provide evidence to substantiate his claims or if this will remain another contentious chapter in US political discourse.