Artist Ernest Zacharevic Sues AirAsia Over Plane Street Mural Removal
Artist Sues AirAsia Over Plane Mural Removal in Malaysia

Artist Ernest Zacharevic Initiates Legal Action Against AirAsia Over Mural Removal

Lithuanian artist Ernest Zacharevic has commenced legal proceedings against the prominent low-cost airline AirAsia, following the removal of one of his acclaimed street murals in Penang, Malaysia. The lawsuit, which has been formally filed in a Malaysian court, alleges that the airline infringed upon the artist's copyright by taking down the artwork without obtaining proper authorisation or consent.

Details of the Controversial Mural and Its Removal

The mural in question, which depicted an AirAsia aeroplane, was originally painted by Zacharevic as part of a broader street art initiative in George Town, Penang, back in 2012. This artistic project significantly contributed to the city's vibrant cultural landscape and its recognition as a UNESCO World Heritage site. According to the legal documents, AirAsia personnel removed the mural in 2025, citing reasons related to brand management and maintenance concerns. However, Zacharevic contends that this action was executed without prior notification or any form of compensation, thereby violating his intellectual property rights.

Legal Claims and Potential Implications for Street Art

In his lawsuit, Zacharevic is seeking substantial financial damages for the alleged copyright infringement, along with a public apology from the airline. The artist argues that the mural, as an original creative work, is protected under Malaysian copyright law, and its unauthorised destruction constitutes a clear breach of these legal protections. This case highlights ongoing tensions between corporate interests and artistic expression in public spaces, potentially setting a significant precedent for how street art is valued and safeguarded in similar contexts worldwide.

AirAsia has yet to issue an official statement regarding the lawsuit, but the outcome could influence future interactions between businesses and urban artists. The dispute underscores the delicate balance between commercial branding and the preservation of cultural heritage within community environments.