Police have closed their investigation into controversial chants led by the frontman of punk rap duo Bob Vylan during a headline performance at Glastonbury Festival this summer. The decision means no further action will be taken against the artist.
Investigation Concludes Without Prosecution
Avon and Somerset Police have confirmed they are taking no further action following a detailed inquiry into chants made during Bob Vylan's set on the West Holts Stage. The performance, which was livestreamed by the BBC on 28 June, featured the chant 'death, death to the IDF' – a reference to the Israel Defence Forces.
The force stated that after a thorough review, there was 'insufficient evidential' basis to secure a realistic prospect of conviction. This conclusion was reached despite the police acknowledging that the comments had provoked significant public anger and widespread debate.
Artist Interviewed and Defiant
The frontman, Bobby Vylan, whose real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster, was voluntarily interviewed by officers in November 2025. Following the police announcement, the artist has remained publicly unapologetic, stating he is 'not regretful' of the chant made during one of the UK's most iconic music festivals.
In a related development, the musical duo has recently initiated defamation proceedings against Irish national broadcaster RTE. They allege that the broadcaster falsely characterised the Glastonbury chants as antisemitic, a claim they strongly contest.
Broader Context and Festival Fallout
The incident highlights the ongoing tensions and complex debates surrounding free speech, artistic expression, and the boundaries of political commentary at major public events. Glastonbury Festival, known for its politically charged history, once again found itself at the centre of a national conversation.
The police's decision brings a formal end to a five-month investigation that scrutinised the content of a live performance watched by thousands on-site and many more via broadcast. The case underscores the challenges authorities face when applying legal frameworks to impromptu statements made in a festival environment.
