Donald Trump's Nobel Prize Ambitions: Fact or Fantasy?
Trump's Nobel Prize delusion: fact or fantasy?

Former US President Donald Trump has once again stirred controversy by insisting he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize for his role in Middle East diplomacy. However, political analysts and historians have dismissed his claims as exaggerated and unfounded.

Trump's Bold Assertions

In a recent interview, Trump boasted about his administration's efforts in brokering the Abraham Accords, a series of agreements between Israel and several Arab states. "I saved the Middle East," he declared, adding that the Nobel committee "should have recognised" his achievements.

Experts Weigh In

Middle East scholars, however, argue that Trump's contributions were overstated. "The Abraham Accords were significant, but they didn't resolve the core issues in the region," said Dr. Sarah Wilkinson, a professor of international relations at Oxford University. "Peace prizes are awarded for transformative actions, not just symbolic agreements."

A History of Controversy

This isn't the first time Trump has expressed frustration over being overlooked for the Nobel. During his presidency, he reportedly lobbied behind the scenes for the honour, even suggesting that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe nominate him.

Critics point out that Trump's tenure was marked by heightened global tensions, including strained relations with traditional allies and a confrontational approach to international diplomacy.

The Nobel Committee's Stance

The Nobel Foundation maintains strict confidentiality around its selection process, but insiders suggest Trump's polarising leadership style made him an unlikely candidate. "The committee tends to avoid figures who divide rather than unite," said a source familiar with the process.

As Trump continues his campaign for recognition, the gap between his self-perception and international opinion appears wider than ever.