Mandelson-Epstein Ties Were Public Before US Ambassador Appointment
Mandelson-Epstein Ties Known Before US Ambassador Role

Public Knowledge of Mandelson-Epstein Links Preceded Ambassador Appointment

As the political storm surrounding Peter Mandelson intensifies, scrutiny is focusing on what information about the disgraced peer's connections to convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was available to the Government before his controversial appointment as US ambassador in February 2025. Sir Keir Starmer's opponents are capitalising on the scandal, challenging the Prime Minister's judgment in selecting Lord Mandelson for such a crucial diplomatic position.

Prime Minister's Admission and Ongoing Pressure

Sir Keir Starmer acknowledged for the first time this week that he was aware Lord Mandelson had maintained ties with Epstein following the financier's 2008 conviction when he appointed him to the role. The Prime Minister stated this awareness prompted specific questioning during the vetting process about the "nature and extent of that relationship." However, Sir Keir has insisted that Lord Mandelson "lied repeatedly" about the extent of his contact with Epstein.

In contrast, the BBC reports that Lord Mandelson maintains he answered all questions accurately during the appointment process. This contradiction is fueling demands for transparency, with growing calls for Prime Minister Starmer to dismiss his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, whom some hold responsible for the controversial appointment decision.

Extensive Public Record of Connections

Numerous reports in the public domain, some dating back to 2019, document regular interactions between Lord Mandelson and Epstein that continued after Epstein's conviction. These records include:

  • A 2019 Channel 4 Dispatches episode alleging Lord Mandelson discussed economic development matters with Epstein relevant to his role as secretary of the board of trade.
  • Financial Times reporting in June 2023 that Epstein facilitated a meeting between Lord Mandelson (then business secretary) and Jes Staley, CEO of JP Morgan's investment banking division.
  • Photographs published by The Sun and Daily Mail in January 2022 purporting to show Lord Mandelson attending Epstein's birthday celebrations after Epstein faced sex offence charges.
  • Additional Financial Times reporting in 2023 on emails suggesting Lord Mandelson stayed at Epstein's mansion in 2009 while Epstein was incarcerated.

Vetting Process Relied on Public Information

Sir Chris Wormold, the UK's top civil servant, confirmed to MPs in October 2025 that formal due diligence for Lord Mandelson's ambassadorial appointment was primarily based on publicly available information, including media reports. This admission raises significant questions about the thoroughness of the vetting process given the substantial public record of the Mandelson-Epstein relationship.

The Conservative Party has highlighted what they term "red flags" that should have precluded Lord Mandelson's appointment to any sensitive position. These include his two cabinet resignations due to "issues of dishonesty and impropriety" and Guardian reporting about his business interests in China and Russia.

Document Release Could Prove Pivotal

The impending publication of documents related to Lord Mandelson's appointment could become a critical turning point in this scandal. Pressure on Prime Minister Starmer is expected to escalate significantly if these documents appear inconsistent with his public statements about the appointment process. While the exact release date remains uncertain, their contents may determine the political fallout from this controversy.