Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is facing mounting criticism after awarding a British Empire Medal to a controversial millionaire plumber who has been dubbed 'the least charitable man in Britain'.
James Anderson, founder of Depher CIC in Lancashire, received the honour from the Princess Royal at Windsor Castle last week for his supposed services to vulnerable people. However, the award has sparked fury among those familiar with Anderson's business practices.
Charity or Exploitation?
While Anderson presents himself as a champion of the elderly and disadvantaged, multiple sources claim his company has been charging exorbitant prices to some of society's most vulnerable members. One pensioner was reportedly charged £890 for work that should have cost under £100, while others have faced bills running into thousands of pounds for basic plumbing tasks.
Local residents and former customers have expressed disbelief at the honour, with one describing Anderson as "the last person who deserves recognition for helping people."
Political Fallout
The controversial award has placed Sunak's judgment under scrutiny, coming at a time when many Britons are struggling with soaring energy bills and rising living costs. Critics question why the Prime Minister would honour someone accused of preying on the very people most affected by the current economic crisis.
The timing couldn't be worse for the Conservative government, which has been attempting to position itself as a defender of consumer interests amid the challenging economic landscape.
Community Outrage
In Lancashire, where Anderson's business operates, community members have expressed shock and anger at the royal recognition. Several residents have come forward with stories of questionable billing practices and aggressive sales tactics targeting elderly homeowners.
One local tradesperson commented: "It's a slap in the face to all the genuine charities and businesses who actually help people without exploiting them."
The controversy raises serious questions about the vetting process for royal honours and whether sufficient due diligence was conducted before bestowing the award.
