Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to "get the balance right" on the proposed Hillsborough Law, after a last-minute government amendment sparked a major row over its potential application to the security services.
Amendment Withdrawn at Eleventh Hour
The Government completely withdrew the Public Office (Accountability) Bill from Monday's parliamentary agenda. This followed initial plans to proceed with its report stage and third reading, with amendments to be brought forward later in the House of Lords.
The decision came after significant backlash against a tabled amendment that would have brought intelligence agencies within the scope of the proposed duty of candour. Critics argued the wording could have allowed spy chiefs to decide whether to disclose information, creating a potential get-out clause.
Prime Minister's Balancing Act
Speaking at a Downing Street press conference on Monday 19 January 2026, Sir Keir Starmer emphasised his commitment to the legislation while highlighting his primary duty to national security.
"I care hugely that we get this right, that we right the wrongs for very many families who have been let down and ensure a better future for families," the Prime Minister told reporters.
He added: "What we’re now trying to do is just make sure we get the balance right when it comes to the application of any principle to the security and intelligence agencies. Obviously, I have to focus on the national interest – my primary duty as Prime Minister, which is to keep this country safe and secure."
Campaigners and Ministers Seek Path Forward
Ministers are now engaged in discussions with campaigners and bereaved families to agree on a way forward for the landmark bill. The proposed law aims to compel public officials and contractors to tell the truth in the aftermath of major disasters.
The campaign group Hillsborough Law Now said it welcomed the Government "listening to the campaign, families, MPs and supporters by withdrawing their security services amendment".
However, the initial amendment drew fierce criticism from prominent Labour figures. Liverpool West Derby MP Ian Byrne stated he could not support the legislation with the government's changes included.
Furthermore, Liverpool City Region mayor Steve Rotheram and Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham warned on Saturday that the amendment "risks undermining the spirit of the legislation" and "creates too broad an opt-out" for the security services.
The focus now shifts to whether a compromise can be found that upholds the core principle of a duty of candour while addressing legitimate national security considerations.
