President Donald Trump has detailed his ambitious proposal for Gaza's reconstruction, centred on a "board of peace" and an initial $7bn (£5.2bn) fund contributed by various nations. This plan, revealed on Sunday 22 February 2026, aims to stabilise the region through a significant military and financial commitment.
International Stabilisation Force Deployment
A cornerstone of the strategy is the deployment of an International Stabilisation Force, totalling 20,000 troops. This force will be led by a US general, with Indonesia pledging 8,000 soldiers, making it the largest contributor. The remaining troops are expected to come from other participating countries, though specific numbers have not been disclosed.
Disarmament of Hamas as a Prerequisite
Trump emphasised that the plan's success hinges on the disarmament of Hamas, asserting that the group has agreed to this condition. This step is seen as critical to ensuring security and paving the way for reconstruction efforts in Gaza.
Composition and Criticisms of the 'Board of Peace'
The "board of peace" includes numerous Middle Eastern and other nations, but it notably excludes Palestinian representatives and major Western allies such as the UK, EU, France, and Germany. This exclusion has sparked concerns about the board's legitimacy and effectiveness.
Critics argue that the structure appears colonial, lacking input from the very people it aims to assist. Additionally, the $7bn fund falls significantly short of the estimated $70bn required for Gaza's full reconstruction, raising questions about the plan's long-term viability.
Funding Shortfalls and Regional Implications
While the $7bn fund represents a substantial initial investment, experts warn that it may be insufficient to address the extensive damage in Gaza. The reliance on international contributions, without clear commitments from all board members, adds uncertainty to the funding stream.
The plan's focus on military stabilisation over political inclusion could complicate efforts to achieve lasting peace, as it may alienate key stakeholders in the region.
