Former Trump Critic Performs Stunning U-Turn, Backs Ex-President's 'Action Not Words' Approach to Ukraine Peace Talks | Daily Mail
Trump Critic Does Shock U-Turn, Backs His Ukraine Peace Plan

In a political manoeuvre that has sent shockwaves through diplomatic circles, prominent technology billionaire and former Trump antagonist David Sacks has executed a breathtaking public U-turn, throwing his weight behind the former President's contentious approach to resolving the brutal conflict in Ukraine.

The Catalyst for a Changed Perspective

Sacks, a co-host of the wildly popular 'All-In' podcast, revealed his transformed stance during a candid and wide-ranging discussion. His critique has pivoted sharply from Trump himself to the current Biden administration's handling of the protracted and bloody war, which has claimed countless lives and destabilised global security.

'We are now in the territory of a bloody stalemate,' Sacks declared, his words carrying the weight of a seasoned investor assessing a failing enterprise. 'This is not winnable for either side anymore.' This stark assessment forms the bedrock of his newfound alignment with Trump's purported strategy.

Praising the 'Art of the Deal' Approach

The core of Sacks' surprising endorsement lies in his praise for what he characterises as Trump's decisive, action-oriented methodology. He lauded the former President's alleged plan to leverage American support as a crucial bargaining chip to force both Kyiv and Moscow to the negotiating table—a move he sees as a necessary jolt to a stagnant diplomatic process.

'He's going to do something. He's not just going to have endless talks,' Sacks stated, drawing a clear contrast with the current White House's policy. This sentiment echoes Trump's long-standing public persona as a dealmaker who prefers tangible results over prolonged deliberation.

A Contentious Proposition for Ending the War

Central to this proposed strategy is a deeply controversial potential concession: compelling Ukraine to cede the Crimean peninsula and the Donbas region to Russia in exchange for a ceasefire and a formal end to hostilities. This notion, while framed as a pragmatic solution to stop the bleeding, is anathema to the Ukrainian government and its many supporters who view it as rewarding outright aggression.

Sacks argues that the human and economic cost of continued fighting far outweighs the concessions, a cold calculus of realpolitik that is certain to provoke fierce debate amongst NATO allies and foreign policy experts.

Shifting Alliances and the Road to 2024

This public endorsement is more than mere commentary; it is a significant political event. Sacks is now poised to co-host a high-profile fundraiser for Trump in San Francisco, a city traditionally considered a fortress of Democratic support. This event signals a potential shift in allegiances within certain elite tech and venture capital circles, highlighting the evolving and often unpredictable nature of political alliances leading into the next presidential election.

The billionaire's reversal underscores a growing faction within the political and business elite that is prioritising what it perceives as pragmatic conflict resolution over ideological solidarity, a shift that could have profound implications for the future of Western support for Ukraine and the broader geopolitical order.