California Governor Gavin Newsom has launched a scathing attack on European leaders, accusing them of "complicity" in their response to former US President Donald Trump's persistent demands to acquire Greenland. Speaking on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos on Tuesday, 20 January 2026, the Democratic presidential front-runner for 2028 did not mince his words regarding the transatlantic diplomatic stance.
A Blunt Assessment of European Diplomacy
Newsom told assembled reporters that European officials were being thoroughly "played" by Trump and that their current strategy of negotiation amounted to sheer "stupidity" rather than genuine diplomacy. The governor emphasised that it was high time for European nations to demonstrate backbone and cease their accommodating approach.
"It's time to buck up, it's time to get serious and stop being complicit," Newsom declared passionately. "I can't take this complicity. People rolling over. I should have brought kneepads for all the world leaders ... this is pathetic."
The Symbolic Kneepads Critique
This reference to kneepads is a recurring theme in Newsom's political rhetoric. He regularly suggests that US politicians who cosy up to Trump should be equipped with kneepads to facilitate their subservience. Indeed, the governor even sells these symbolic items on his official website, marketing them as essential accessories for those willing to grovel.
The advertisement for the kneepads, which bear a replica of Trump's signature, reads pointedly: "For all your groveling to Trump needs now in Republican red. For the low low price of your soul." This merchandise underscores Newsom's view that compromising principles for political expediency comes at an unacceptable moral cost.
European Reluctance and the 'Trump Whisperer' Phenomenon
European leaders have demonstrated considerable hesitation in risking an open rupture with the United States, given the nation's status as a major trading partner and crucial security ally. This cautious approach has led several European figures to position themselves as potential "Trump whisperers," attempting to maintain dialogue to prevent destabilising actions such as withdrawal of support for Ukraine or exit from NATO.
However, Trump's demands regarding Greenland—a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark—and his threats to impose tariffs until the territory is ceded, have generated widespread confusion and anger across European capitals. Some policymakers have even proposed retaliatory tariffs against the United States in response.
The Flattering Correspondence
In the lead-up to the World Economic Forum, numerous European politicians sought meetings with Trump through written correspondence. One notable letter came from Mark Rutte, the Secretary-General of NATO and former Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who adopted an notably flattering tone.
Rutte praised Trump's achievements, stating: "What you accomplished in Syria today is incredible," referring to the recent ceasefire between Syrian government forces and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces. He further promised to highlight Trump's work in Syria, Gaza, and Ukraine during his media engagements in Davos, adding: "I am committed to finding a way forward on Greenland. Can't wait to see you."
This correspondence exemplifies the delicate balancing act European leaders are attempting, striving to maintain functional relations while addressing Trump's unconventional and contentious demands.
The Broader Implications for Transatlantic Relations
Newsom's outburst highlights growing concerns about the state of transatlantic diplomacy and the principles guiding international relations. His critique suggests that appeasement strategies may ultimately undermine European sovereignty and global stability. As the 2028 US presidential election approaches, Newsom's positioning on foreign policy and his willingness to challenge both domestic and international political norms is becoming increasingly defined.
The situation surrounding Greenland continues to serve as a flashpoint, testing the resilience of diplomatic channels and the willingness of nations to uphold territorial integrity against powerful economic and political pressures.
