Section 21 Evictions Banned: New Era for England's 4.6m Renters
Section 21 Evictions Banned in England from May

A Landmark Shift for England's Tenants

England's private rental sector is poised for its most significant transformation in decades. The government's Renters' Rights Act promises to rebalance power between landlords and the 4.6 million households who rely on private rentals for shelter. The centrepiece of this reform is the long-awaited ban on section 21 'no-fault' evictions, which will be outlawed from next May.

Enforcement Crisis: A Warning from Recent History

However, troubling data casts doubt on whether these new rights will be more than just words on paper. An analysis by the Guardian has uncovered a profound enforcement crisis. Over the past three years, two-thirds of councils in England did not prosecute a single landlord. Nearly half issued no fines, and fewer than 2% of tenant complaints led to any form of enforcement action.

The scale of inaction is staggering. In this period, a mere 16 landlords were banned from letting properties across the entire country. This shockingly low number raises serious questions about the capacity of local authorities to uphold the new laws, especially given the volume of complaints and the well-documented scandals within the sector.

New Tools, Old Problems: The Resource Dilemma

The new legislation introduces several mechanisms designed to improve standards. A mandatory decent homes standard for private rentals is being consulted on, though its implementation remains distant. From next year, councils will be legally required to report on their enforcement activity, and a new landlords' register should provide clearer oversight.

Yet, recent history is littered with examples where strong legislation was undermined by poor enforcement. The catastrophic pollution by water companies and some of the failures that led to the Grenfell Tower fire serve as stark warnings. Ministers have pledged "burdens funding" for councils, but environmental health departments were decimated by austerity and cannot be rebuilt overnight.

With many councils facing severe financial pressure and even risk of bankruptcy, the government must explain how the enforcement of these new renter rights will be sustainably funded. Provision for staff training and recruitment is essential; new rules are useless without people to implement them.

While the new housing ombudsman will offer mediation, there must be robust mechanisms to compel landlord compliance. For the millions priced out of homeownership and without access to social housing, effective enforcement is not a luxury—it is the very least they deserve.