Paul Scholes Clarifies 'Brutal' Criticism of Man United's Michael Carrick
Scholes Explains Controversial Social Media Attack on Carrick

Manchester United icon Paul Scholes has finally addressed the significant controversy surrounding his recent social media criticism of interim manager Michael Carrick. Scholes sparked widespread debate last week following United's 2-1 defeat to Newcastle, when he posted a now-deleted Instagram story that bluntly described the team's performances as "c**p" under Carrick's guidance.

The Viral Social Media Post

In the contentious Instagram story, Scholes wrote: "Michael has definitely got something special about him... cos United have been c**p in the last four games... night." The former midfielder accompanied this message with a kissing face emoji, followed by the name "Tonali" and a love heart symbol, referencing Newcastle star Sandro Tonali. This was widely interpreted as a direct attack on his former teammate Carrick, joining fellow United legends Roy Keane and Gary Neville in questioning whether Carrick should secure the permanent managerial position despite overseeing just one defeat in eight matches.

Scholes Provides Context

Speaking on The Good, The Bad & The Football podcast, Scholes attempted to clarify his position and insisted his comments had been misunderstood. "It was in no way intended to be offensive towards Michael," Scholes explained. "Michael is one of the nicest people you will ever meet in football and he'd be the last person I would want to offend."

Scholes revealed he had personally messaged Carrick to address the situation, stating: "I messaged Michael anyway and said 'look I was never intending to upset you', and I don't think I needed to say that anyway. He told me he wasn't upset." The former England international emphasized that his criticism was purely performance-based, noting: "I think people just interpreted it differently from what was meant. The only thing I would say is I don't think they've played that well over the last four games, but they're still managing to get results."

Former Teammates Weigh In

Scholes' podcast co-host Wes Brown acknowledged understanding both perspectives, though he initially interpreted the post as a dig. Scholes responded: "What Wes said... and I hadn't heard that before, was that I was saying he was just a lucky manager. I wasn't saying that, I was saying he's a very talented manager because he's been getting a result for the last four games since the West Ham game when they've not been playing very well."

Another former United teammate, Nicky Butt, appeared to defend Scholes, commenting: "Michael would never take it that way. He'll have taken it the way it was meant by Scholsey. Michael even said it himself that we've not played that well in the last few games."

Rio Ferdinand's Perspective

United legend Rio Ferdinand also contributed to the discussion on his Rio Ferdinand Presents podcast, revealing he had contacted Scholes directly about the controversial post. "Everyone was saying 'what's Scholsey doing'," Ferdinand recalled. "I texted him saying what's going on? Scholsey doesn't mince words."

Ferdinand continued: "He said 'I said he's special, but we have been rubbish the last four games'. He isn't wrong in terms of performance, it hasn't been top quality. People have been like 'I thought he was his teammate, I thought he'd support him a bit more'. The questions people are asking is whether there is a little bit of beef between them."

The former defender clarified: "Listen, there's not beef between them. They're two really placid and calm guys who have the utmost respect for each other. It was just interpreted differently to the way Paul Scholes meant it to come across. He is just being honest and brutal." Ferdinand added insight into Scholes' character: "Scholesy didn't say much in the changing room but when he did it was normally a cutting comment so I'm not surprised at how he is as a pundit now."

Previous Doubts About Carrick's Credentials

This social media controversy followed Scholes' earlier questioning of whether Carrick possesses the necessary experience for the permanent United managerial role. "The question is, has Michael got the experience?" Scholes had previously asked. "I know it's a big question, I know he has managed in the Championship, but this is different."

Scholes elaborated on his concerns: "Can we see Michael winning the Premier League? I don't know yet, and I think the biggest thing is, what type of manager will they look for? A tactician or a man-manager who looks after people?" He drew comparisons to former manager Ole Gunnar Solskjær, noting: "Ole Gunnar was that. But all the people who are man-managers, they always have a brilliant coach next to them, which Michael has got (Steve Holland)."

Carrick's Response to Criticism

Speaking about the constant analysis from his former teammates back in January, Carrick maintained that external opinions "didn't bother" him. "They're not putting more pressure on me," Carrick stated. "I don't feel that. There are plenty of opinions around, some positive, some not too much. It's totally irrelevant in terms of what I focus on."

The interim manager emphasized his focus remains on improvement: "I know what we want to improve on, how we want to work with the players. There's a lot that can be said, it's the way of the world. I'm not going to pay too much attention to that. For me, the players and staff it's a focus on how we're going to succeed."

Patrice Evra's Strong Reaction

Former United defender Patrice Evra recently expressed frustration with Scholes, Keane, and Neville for their perceived lack of support for Carrick. "I hope Paul Scholes' Instagram story is fake, I hope he was hacked," Evra told Stake. "To be honest, I'm not surprised at that from Scholesy. He was the quietest player I've ever played with in my entire career. Now, in the media, he drops bombshells."

Evra continued his criticism: "I really don't understand the lack of support behind Michael Carrick, he's one of us and he's doing very well. There's been negative analysis from Scholesy, but also from Roy Keane and Gary Neville. It annoys me because we want to be in the top four, and those comments are unnecessary, but this is what you do when you work in TV. You can't be positive, you have to be negative."

The Frenchman highlighted the pundits' managerial records, stating: "Most of these guys get a managerial job and get fired straight away. I said to Neville: 'It's easy to talk on TV. When you were at Valencia, they asked you for paella, and you gave them fish and chips.' After three months, they said goodbye. People can't forget what they have done as a manager. As players, they're legends, but as managers, they haven't done a great job. So for them to speak and possibly kill the career of a manager, it's a little bit too much."