Emma Hayes and Ian Wright have criticised VAR decisions during England's 1-1 draw with Uruguay at Wembley, warning that the World Cup could be ruined if inconsistencies continue. The technology was involved in two key moments: Ben White's goal was allowed after a review, but a soft penalty was awarded against him in stoppage time for a challenge on Federico Vinas, which Valverde converted.
Hayes, speaking on ITV Sport, questioned the selective use of VAR: 'What’s the point of having VAR? If we’re using it for penalty or corner situations but not for blatant red card moments, I don’t understand.' Wright echoed the sentiment, highlighting a tackle by Ronald Araujo on Phil Foden that went unpunished despite studs being planted into the midfielder's shin, forcing him off injured.
The match saw several inconsistencies, with the penalty given for White's attempt to block the ball while Araujo's reckless challenge was not even booked. Critics argue that VAR applies rules in a black-and-white manner without room for common sense, leading to frustration among players and fans alike.
With the World Cup approaching, there are concerns that similar officiating errors could overshadow the tournament. The problem, many believe, lies not with the technology itself but with the incompetence of the officials using it. A consistent approach is needed to prevent VAR from dominating headlines for the wrong reasons.
