The government is facing sharp criticism over its decision to potentially reverse a proposed blanket ban on social media use for under-16s, with accusations that it remains "firmly on the fence" regarding child protection. An amendment to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, set for debate next week, would scrap the direct ban previously backed by the House of Lords in favour of more adaptable powers.
From Ban to Flexible Powers
Instead of imposing a strict age limit, the revised proposal would grant ministers authority to block children from "specified internet services," allowing for measures such as social media curfews or screen time restrictions. This shift has sparked controversy, as the Lords had advocated for a straightforward prohibition on user-to-user platforms for those under 16.
Lord Nash's Strong Opposition
Lord Nash, a Conservative former minister who championed the original ban through the upper House, has condemned the government's amendment as a "blank cheque." He argues that it demonstrates a lack of commitment to raising the age limit for harmful social media platforms to 16.
In a statement to the Press Association, Lord Nash said, "The Government's amendment confirms that they remain firmly on the fence on how best to protect children. In fact, it is patently clear that raising the age limit to 16 for harmful social media platforms is far from their preferred option."
He warned that MPs must decide on Monday whether to support his proposal, which peers backed in January by 261 votes to 150, or opt for the government's amendment, which he claims will lead to further delays and potential dilution by big tech lobbyists.
Government's Consultation and Defence
Concurrently, the government launched an online safety consultation on Monday, exploring themes such as minimum age requirements for social media platforms and the disabling of addictive features like autoplay. Technology Secretary Liz Kendall emphasised the challenges parents face in managing children's screen time and online exposure.
She urged public participation, stating, "We know parents everywhere are grappling with how much screen time their children should have, when they should give them a phone, what they are seeing online, and the impact all of this is having. Together, we will create a digital world that gives young people the childhood they deserve and prepares them for the future."
Implications and Upcoming Debate
The amendment, if approved, would empower ministers with discretion over specific measures rather than enforcing a uniform ban. Lord Nash has backed a campaign by RaiseTheAge.org.uk ahead of the Commons debate, insisting his proposal is "the only legislative vehicle on the table that will force the Government to raise the age limit."
He called on MPs to support his plan "without hesitating," highlighting the 111-vote majority it received in the Lords. The outcome of Monday's debate will determine whether the UK moves toward a flexible approach or a definitive age-based restriction on social media access for minors.
