AFL Accused of Political Bias After Copyright Clash with Liberal Leader
AFL Accused of Political Bias in Copyright Dispute

AFL Faces Allegations of Political Favouritism in Copyright Dispute

The Australian Football League has found itself embroiled in a political controversy after demanding the removal of a social media post from Victorian Liberal leader Jess Wilson. The incident has prompted former Victorian premier Jeff Kennett to launch a scathing attack, accusing the league of functioning as "an arm for the Labor Party" and abandoning political neutrality.

The Contentious Video and Copyright Claim

Last week, Jess Wilson uploaded a short Instagram video filmed at the Melbourne Cricket Ground during the Collingwood versus St Kilda match. In the clip, Wilson highlighted how many meat pies could be purchased with the $15 billion she alleges has been lost to corruption on Victorian major projects under Premier Jacinta Allan's government.

"Remember that $15 billion that Labor gave to the CFMEU and into the pockets of criminals? Well, it could have bought 2.4 billion pies at the footy, or enough pies to feed this crowd at 29,000 games," Wilson stated in her video.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

The AFL's government relations manager, Bec Smith, contacted Wilson requesting the video's removal because it contained approximately two seconds of match footage that allegedly violated the league's copyright rules. According to AFL policy, recordings or photographs cannot be made for any purpose other than private non-commercial use without approval.

Political Connections and Allegations of Bias

The situation escalated when attention turned to Smith's superior, AFL corporate affairs executive general manager Sharon McCrohan, who has previously performed media work for both the Australian Labor Party and the CFMEU. A senior opposition figure told media outlets that the removal request represented "a pathetic attempt by McCrohan's team to stop Wilson shining a light on $15 billion of CFMEU corruption."

Jeff Kennett amplified these concerns in a social media post, writing: "Banning a post by Jess Wilson while allowing one by Jacinta Allan is only further proof. The AFL accepts public monies they should be politically neutral. And Commission do nothing." Kennett specifically referenced Premier Jacinta Allan's own 30-second Instagram clip from the 2024 AFL grand final opening bounce, which remained untouched by copyright enforcement.

AFL Response and Wilson's Defiance

The AFL issued a statement on Sunday clarifying that McCrohan had no involvement in the decision to request the video's removal. AFL spokesperson Jay Allan confirmed that McCrohan did not authorise the request and was unaware of it.

Despite the league's copyright claim, Wilson has firmly refused to delete her post. "It was absolutely ridiculous to receive the request from the AFL," she told reporters. "I won't be intimidated by any organisation, whether that's the AFL, whether that's the Labor Party, whether that's the CFMEU, or organised crime. I will always continue to shine a light on the $15 billion of taxpayer money that's gone into the pockets of criminals in this state under Jacinta Allan's watch."

Public Reaction and Broader Implications

Online commentary largely supported Wilson's position while criticising the AFL for perceived double standards. One social media user commented: "I heard the AFL tried to take this post down because the footage violated the AFL's copyright. Good on you Jess for keeping it up." Another wrote: "The AFL is little more than a propaganda machine these days. Sad situation when the on-field game itself doesn't seem to be their top priority."

The controversy raises significant questions about how sporting organisations navigate political neutrality while enforcing copyright policies. With the AFL receiving substantial public funding, Kennett's accusation that the league should maintain political impartiality has gained traction among critics who view the copyright enforcement as selectively applied based on political content rather than consistent policy application.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration