An Afghan interpreter has been ordered by the High Court to pay £75,000 in legal fees after breaching a superinjunction intended to protect the identity of a British soldier involved in a controversial case.
The interpreter, who assisted UK forces in Afghanistan, shared confidential details online, violating the court order. The superinjunction was initially granted to prevent the soldier from being identified in relation to alleged misconduct during military operations.
What Went Wrong?
The breach occurred when the interpreter disclosed sensitive information on social media, leading to a legal battle. The High Court ruled that the interpreter must cover the substantial costs incurred by the Ministry of Defence in rectifying the breach.
Why This Matters
Superinjunctions are rare and are used in extreme cases to prevent sensitive information from becoming public. This case highlights the severe consequences of violating such orders, particularly when national security and reputational damage are at stake.
The ruling also raises questions about the responsibilities of those who work alongside military personnel and the legal repercussions of mishandling classified information.
