Fresh allegations have emerged that could severely damage the reputation of former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, placing him at the heart of a major political storm. According to an exclusive report, Mr Johnson is accused of engaging in activities that appear to contradict the UK's firm stance against the Kremlin.
Lobbying for a Kremlin Oil Giant
The controversy centres on claims that the ex-PM lobbied on behalf of Rosneft, the Russian state-controlled oil company. This is the same energy giant that was directly targeted by Western sanctions following Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The reports suggest Johnson's actions were aimed at protecting Rosneft's interests in Europe.
This revelation is particularly explosive given Johnson's very public role as a vocal supporter of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. His post-premiership has been largely defined by his strong anti-Kremlin rhetoric, making these new allegations seem deeply contradictory.
A Pattern of Controversial Links
This is not the first time Johnson's associations have been scrutinised. The report highlights his previous involvement with Rosneft's former chairman, a close Putin ally. Furthermore, his government's tenure was marked by accusations of turning a blind eye to the flow of Russian money into London, earning the capital the unflattering nickname 'Londongrad'.
The key questions now being asked in Westminster are:
- Did Boris Johnson use his position and influence to benefit a sanctioned Russian entity?
- How do these actions align with the UK's official foreign policy on Ukraine?
- What does this say about the accountability of former prime ministers?
Political Fallout and Public Outrage
The allegations have triggered a wave of criticism from across the political spectrum. MPs and anti-corruption campaigners have expressed profound concern, labelling the situation a 'betrayal' of Ukraine and a 'slap in the face' to the Ukrainian people.
This scandal threatens to overshadow Johnson's legacy and raises serious questions about the intersection of private business interests and public duty for high-profile former leaders. As the story develops, pressure is mounting for a full and transparent investigation into the nature and extent of his dealings.
