Far-right activist Tommy Robinson found himself at the centre of a legal showdown after refusing to surrender his mobile phone PIN to police officers during a Channel Tunnel crossing, a court has heard.
The controversial English Defence League founder, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, allegedly told Kent Police officers "not a chance, bruv" when they demanded access to his device during a stop at the Folkestone terminal on July 2.
Confrontation at the Crossroads
Canterbury Crown Court was told that Robinson had been travelling to France with his family when the confrontation unfolded. Prosecutors detailed how police approached the activist's vehicle and requested he provide his phone's passcode - a demand that was met with immediate refusal.
The 41-year-old from Luton faces charges of causing a public nuisance following the incident, which occurred amid heightened security concerns at the critical transport link between Britain and mainland Europe.
The Legal Standoff
Robinson's defiant response to police has sparked debate about privacy rights versus law enforcement powers. The court heard how the situation escalated rapidly after his refusal to comply with the officers' request.
Prosecutor Paul Valder told jurors: "He was asked to provide his PIN for his mobile phone. His response was, 'Not a chance, bruv.'" This exchange forms a central part of the prosecution's case against the activist.
Background of Tensions
The incident occurred during what Robinson described as a family trip to France. However, the timing raised questions given his history of immigration protests and previous attempts to document migrant activity around Channel crossing points.
Robinson, who has become a polarising figure in British politics, has repeatedly claimed he was merely exercising his right to privacy and free movement during the encounter.
Broader Implications
Legal experts suggest the case could set important precedents regarding police powers to access digital devices during border checks. The outcome may influence how similar standoffs are handled in future, particularly at sensitive transport infrastructure like the Channel Tunnel.
The trial continues as both sides prepare to present further evidence about the circumstances surrounding the confrontation and whether Robinson's actions constituted a genuine public nuisance.
