Should Social Media Be Banned for Kids Under 16? MPs Push for Stricter Regulations
MPs Push for Social Media Ban for Under-16s

A group of cross-party MPs is urging the UK government to consider banning social media access for children under the age of 16, citing growing concerns over mental health risks and online safety.

The proposal, backed by former health secretary Jeremy Hunt and other prominent figures, argues that platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat contribute to anxiety, depression, and exposure to harmful content among young users.

Why a Ban?

Research indicates that excessive social media use correlates with increased rates of anxiety, poor sleep, and cyberbullying among teenagers. MPs suggest that delaying access until age 16 could help mitigate these risks.

Key Arguments:

  • Mental Health Protection: Studies link prolonged social media use to rising teen depression.
  • Online Safety: Children are vulnerable to predators, misinformation, and inappropriate content.
  • Addiction Concerns: Algorithm-driven platforms are designed to keep users engaged for extended periods.

Government Response

While the Online Safety Act already imposes stricter rules on tech companies, critics argue enforcement remains weak. The proposed ban would require platforms to implement stricter age verification, potentially through ID checks.

Opponents, however, warn that an outright ban could push children towards unregulated platforms or limit access to educational resources.

What’s Next?

The debate continues as policymakers weigh the balance between protecting young users and preserving digital freedoms. Parents are encouraged to monitor screen time and engage in open discussions about online risks.