Greens Warn New Hate Speech Laws Could Target Israel Critics
Greens Warn New Hate Speech Laws Could Target Israel Critics

The Australian Greens have raised concerns that the federal government's newly passed hate speech legislation could criminalise legitimate criticism of Israel and its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The party's justice spokesperson, David Shoebridge, argued that rushed amendments agreed between Labor and the Coalition after the Bondi terror attacks represent an unprecedented expansion of political power to ban organisations and criminalise speech based on vague standards.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke rejected the claims, insisting the laws are necessary to protect Australians, particularly members of the Jewish community. However, Shoebridge warned that criticism of Israel or Netanyahu could be deemed an offence if it causes psychological harm and prompts warnings from intelligence agencies.

Constitutional expert Professor Anne Twomey said the ambiguity of the laws risks having a chilling effect on free speech. She noted that criticism of Israel and its government, including suggestions of genocide, could trigger the process for inciting racial hatred. The progressive Jewish Council of Australia accused Labor of a 'Trumpian repression of democratic rights', while the Palestine Action Group warned the changes should be 'deeply disturbing to everyone in this country'.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Attorney General Michelle Rowland confirmed that the new hate group laws could theoretically affect groups accusing Israel of genocide, but stressed that other criteria, including breaches of state laws on racial vilification, would also need to be met. She said the laws target neo-Nazi and Islamist groups like the National Socialist Network and Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Independent senators, including David Pocock, sought to amend the bill to clarify that the new aggravated sentencing provisions do not apply to criticism of foreign state policies or discussion of international law. The Australian Human Rights Commission president, Hugh de Kretser, welcomed the laws but called for stronger safeguards, including procedural fairness, to prevent inappropriate decisions.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration