Campaigners, teenagers, legislators and experts have voiced their opinions on the UK government’s consultation on improving online safety for children, with many backing stricter measures for under-16s. The consultation, which closes on Tuesday, is expected to lead to action against big tech, including a potential Australia-style social media ban or restrictions on addictive features like infinite scrolling.
Online safety campaigner Russell, whose 14-year-old daughter Molly died after viewing harmful content on Instagram and Pinterest, opposes a blanket ban. He argues it would create a “cliff edge” that exposes teenagers to dangerous platforms once they turn 16. Instead, he supports blocking platforms that fail to meet safety standards for under-16s, while allowing access to “safe” apps. He also calls for a ban on aggressive algorithms and addictive features such as infinite scrolling and autoplay.
Esther Ghey, whose daughter Brianna was murdered in 2023, believes social media addiction contributed to her mental health issues. She supports raising the age of social media to 16 and curbing addictive features. “Social media represents a serious risk to under-16s,” she said, while also emphasising the need for digital literacy education to help teenagers navigate online spaces safely.
Teenager Fin, however, finds the proposals “incredibly harsh”, arguing that social media helps young people stay connected and follow news. He supports regulating addictive designs but warns against a blanket ban. “There’s so much more nuance to the debate than what’s currently being put in,” he said, noting that many measures, such as the smartphone ban in schools, have not been properly considered.
The government has pledged to act swiftly after the consultation, with ministers already indicating support for an Australia-style ban or restrictions on addictive features. The Online Safety Act, which requires tech firms to shield children from harmful content, has been criticised for its slow implementation.
