Labour Faces 'Dictator' Claims Over Mayoral Election Delay to 2028
Government rejects 'dictator' claims over mayoral vote delay

Downing Street has forcefully rejected accusations that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is behaving like a "dictator" amidst a fierce political row over the Government's decision to postpone four upcoming mayoral elections.

Plans for Delay Spark Fury

The controversy erupted after the Government indicated it was "minded" to push back inaugural mayoral votes for Sussex and Brighton, Hampshire and the Solent, Norfolk and Suffolk, and Greater Essex. These elections, originally expected next year, could now be delayed until May 2028.

Ministers, including Local Government Secretary Steve Reed, argue the three-year postponement is necessary to allow more time for the reorganisation of local authorities, a key part of Labour's devolution agenda. A Number 10 spokesman insisted the move was about implementing devolution in "a pragmatic and structured way", ensuring new mayors have the correct structures to succeed from their first day.

A Cross-Party Backlash

The proposal has triggered a storm of criticism from opposition parties and within Labour's own ranks. Reform UK stated bluntly that "only dictators cancel elections", while Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused Labour of cancelling democracy for a second time and vowed to oppose the move "every step of the way".

Significant criticism also came from within the Labour party. Former Labour local government minister Jim McMahon, who returned to the backbenches after a recent reshuffle, delivered a blunt warning in the Commons. He said the Government had a "moral and a legal obligation" to honour its deal with local leaders who worked in good faith. "Trust is hard won but is easily squandered," he added.

The backlash extended to local government. The leader of Essex County Council, Conservative Kevin Bentley, expressed "huge disappointment", noting candidates had already been selected and campaigning was underway. The County Councils Network labelled the delay "bitterly disappointing".

Logistical and Financial Fallout

The postponement has created practical headaches and potential waste. The Association of Electoral Administrators warned that dozens of councils had already begun costly preparations. Its chief executive, Peter Stanyon, called for clarity on reimbursing these expenses.

The delay is the second such postponement, following the earlier move to push council elections in nine areas from 2025 to 2026. Reform leader Nigel Farage, MP for Clacton, branded the overall reorganisation a "dog's dinner" confusing to the public.

In defence, local government minister Miatta Fahnbulleh argued the "breathing room" would make the eventual authorities stronger. Downing Street reiterated that the plans are subject to statutory consultations and working with local councils.

Despite the assurances, the political damage is mounting. The Liberal Democrats accused Labour and the Conservatives of a "blatant stitch-up", while independent local government experts criticised the sudden change for undermining trust in the devolution process.