In a blistering critique that has sent shockwaves through diplomatic circles, former US President Donald Trump has condemned the newly unveiled Gaza ceasefire agreement, delivering his verdict in characteristically uncompromising terms.
'A Total Disaster for Israel'
The Republican leader didn't mince words when addressing the deal negotiated by the current administration, describing it as "a total disaster for Israel and a great victory for Hamas." His statement, released through his campaign apparatus, comes as world leaders cautiously welcome the potential breakthrough in the protracted conflict.
Security Concerns and Political Fallout
Trump's primary objection centres on security provisions within the agreement. He asserted that the deal effectively rewards what he termed "terrorists" while leaving Israel vulnerable to future attacks. "This agreement makes Israel less safe and gives Hamas everything they wanted," he claimed, though he stopped short of detailing specific alternative approaches.
The timing of Trump's intervention is particularly significant, coming as the agreement faces scrutiny from multiple quarters. His comments are likely to influence Republican lawmakers and could shape the domestic political landscape surrounding US involvement in Middle East peace efforts.
Contrasting Leadership Approaches
Drawing implicit comparisons with his own administration's policies, Trump suggested that the current approach represented a dramatic departure from what he characterised as stronger, more principled stance toward the region. His statement emphasised his administration's relocation of the US embassy to Jerusalem and brokering of the Abraham Accords as examples of successful Middle East diplomacy.
International Reaction and Next Steps
While international mediators have expressed cautious optimism about the agreement's potential to halt the violence and address humanitarian concerns, Trump's intervention highlights the deep political divisions that continue to surround US Middle East policy.
As the deal moves toward implementation, the former president's stark condemnation ensures that it will remain a contentious issue in American political discourse, with implications extending far beyond the immediate humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
