The University of Edinburgh is reconsidering its adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism after an internal report raised concerns about its historical links to colonialism.
The report, commissioned by the university, examined the institution's past and found troubling connections to colonial-era policies. This has prompted a broader review of the IHRA definition, which was adopted in 2019.
Why the Review Matters
Critics argue that the IHRA definition may inadvertently stifle legitimate criticism of Israel, conflating it with antisemitism. The university's colonial audit has added fuel to this debate, with some academics calling for a more nuanced approach.
Key findings from the report include:
- Historical ties to colonial enterprises
- Potential conflicts with academic freedom
- Calls for a more inclusive definition
What Happens Next?
The university has not yet made a final decision but has confirmed that the findings of the colonial audit will inform its next steps. A spokesperson stated, "We are committed to fostering an inclusive environment while upholding academic freedom."
This development places Edinburgh at the centre of a growing debate about how universities address both historical injustices and contemporary issues of discrimination.
