Far-right activist Tommy Robinson has lost his appeal against a conviction for contempt of court after posting messages on Telegram about a high-profile criminal case in Southport.
The Court of Appeal ruled that Robinson's actions risked prejudicing legal proceedings by sharing details that could influence potential jurors. The posts were related to an ongoing investigation in Merseyside.
Court Upholds Contempt Finding
Judges dismissed Robinson's argument that his Telegram messages were protected under free speech laws. They emphasised that the right to a fair trial must take precedence over individual expression in such cases.
The original conviction stemmed from Robinson discussing sensitive details about defendants before their trial had concluded. Legal experts warn such behaviour can undermine the justice system.
Background of the Case
The Southport case involved serious criminal allegations that attracted significant media attention. Robinson's intervention through social media prompted concerns about trial integrity.
This isn't the first time the controversial activist has faced legal consequences for his online activities. Previous incidents have seen him jailed for similar contempt offences.
Reactions to the Ruling
Legal professionals have welcomed the decision, seeing it as reinforcement of court authority in the digital age. However, Robinson's supporters claim it represents an attack on free speech.
The judgement serves as a reminder that social media posts can have serious legal consequences, particularly when discussing active court cases.
