Advocates in New South Wales have raised serious concerns over the state's Family Protection Orders (FPO) and Workplace Protection Orders (WPO), labelling them as excessively punitive. Critics argue that these schemes disproportionately target vulnerable individuals, often exacerbating their hardships rather than offering genuine protection.
Growing Criticism
Legal experts and advocacy groups claim that the NSW Police's approach to FPOs and WPOs is heavy-handed, with many orders being issued without sufficient evidence or due process. This has led to situations where individuals, particularly those from marginalised communities, face severe restrictions based on minimal grounds.
Impact on Vulnerable Groups
Reports suggest that these orders are frequently used against victims of domestic violence or those experiencing mental health crises, rather than against perpetrators. Advocates highlight cases where individuals have been barred from their homes or workplaces without adequate legal recourse, further isolating them from support networks.
Calls for Reform
Organisations such as the NSW Council for Civil Liberties are urging the government to review the schemes, emphasising the need for greater transparency and fairness. They propose measures such as mandatory legal advice before orders are issued and stricter oversight to prevent misuse.
The debate continues as stakeholders push for a system that balances public safety with individual rights, ensuring that protection orders serve their intended purpose without causing undue harm.
