A former professional golf champion has suffered a crushing legal defeat after a High Court judge condemned his "manipulative and bullying" behaviour towards tenants living in luxury lodges on his country estate.
Peter Baker, who claimed victory at the 1956 PGA Close Championship, spent seven years pursuing a bitter dispute against couples residing in upscale holiday accommodations on his picturesque property in Much Birch, Herefordshire.
The Judge's Stern Rebuke
In a damning ruling, Judge Russen QC delivered a scathing assessment of Baker's conduct throughout the prolonged legal battle. The court heard how the 88-year-old former sports star engaged in behaviour described as:
- Deliberately manipulative towards tenants
- Bullying in his business practices
- Attempting to mislead the court proceedings
Seven Years of Legal Warfare
The dispute centred around Baker's attempts to remove tenants from luxury lodges situated on his sprawling country estate. Despite his advanced age, Baker pursued the case with remarkable determination, dragging multiple residents through years of stressful litigation.
Judge Russen's ruling noted that Baker's conduct had caused significant distress to the defendants, who had sought nothing more than peaceful enjoyment of their holiday homes.
A Champion's Fall from Grace
Baker's current legal troubles stand in stark contrast to his earlier sporting achievements. During his professional golfing heyday, he enjoyed considerable success, including:
- Winning the prestigious PGA Close Championship in 1956
- Competing alongside golfing legends of his era
- Establishing himself as a respected figure in British golf
The court's decision represents a significant blow to the former athlete's reputation, with the judge's strong words likely to overshadow his sporting legacy.
Property Disputes and Tenant Rights
This case highlights the complex dynamics of landlord-tenant relationships in luxury holiday accommodation markets. The ruling serves as a reminder that property owners, regardless of their status or background, must adhere to ethical business practices and respect tenant rights.
The judgment reinforces legal protections for tenants facing aggressive tactics from landlords and sets an important precedent for similar disputes in the holiday let sector.
