Andy Burnham's proposal to establish a 'No 10 North' in Manchester as part of a broader devolution of power has drawn mixed reactions from the public. The plan, which the Greater Manchester mayor says would create a 'nerve centre of a rewired Britain', aims to redistribute resources and decision-making away from Westminster.
Supporters argue the move would help redress the power imbalance and demonstrate that effective governance can operate outside London. One reader from Lancashire called it a 'stellar idea' that could bring investment and improved infrastructure to northern regions, while another noted it would show 'things can work if not solely based in London'.
However, critics question the cost and practical benefits. A former civil servant raised concerns about duplicating security and telecommunications infrastructure, warning of 'unrealistic initial costings'. Others argued that Manchester, already a recipient of significant investment, is not the ideal location. A reader from Plymouth suggested that placing the office in a smaller city like Norwich or Truro would better expose policymakers to rural challenges.
Some respondents emphasised the need for collaboration across northern regions rather than competition. A Newcastle-based CEO highlighted how local rivalries between Sunderland and Newcastle hinder investment, urging a focus on regional cooperation rather than a single hub.
Despite differing views, many agreed on the need for systemic change. Key priorities identified include better housing, improved transport links, and more equitable distribution of resources across the UK.
