Texas Judge Faces Backlash Over Inmate Bond Decision
A Texas judge faces backlash after granting bond to a suspect under questionable procedural grounds, sparking debate over judicial oversight.
A Texas judge faces backlash after granting bond to a suspect under questionable procedural grounds, sparking debate over judicial oversight.
A judge presiding over the Sheku Bayoh inquiry has refused to recuse himself despite claims of bias, sparking a legal standoff with police representatives.
Judge Renato Freitas sparks outrage in Brazil after a divisive decision in Curitiba, raising questions about judicial impartiality and social justice.
Calls grow for police transparency as forces resist revealing suspect ethnicity in major cases, sparking debates over accountability and public trust.
A Colorado man has been taken into custody for allegedly making death threats against a Southern California judge, sparking concerns over judicial safety.
The UK government's recent attacks on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) are not just about sovereignty—they undermine judicial independence and the rule of law itself.
A damning new poll reveals over half of Britons think judges are influenced by politics, sparking fresh debates about judicial impartiality.
An Iranian man convicted of raping a 13-year-old girl in an alleyway has been sentenced to just seven years in prison, sparking outrage as the judge ruled he 'did not pose a danger to the public.'
Judges in England and Wales are issuing apologies for imposing now-defunct IPP sentences, leaving thousands in legal limbo. Discover the shocking details behind this ongoing scandal.
A prosecutor involved in the case against Donald Trump is now facing an investigation by the Office of the Special Counsel, raising questions about potential misconduct.
Federal Judge Esther Salas has been targeted with fresh threats, highlighting the growing dangers faced by US judiciary members. Authorities are investigating the latest incident.
Former US President Donald Trump has announced sanctions against Brazil following allegations of judicial interference in the trial of ex-leader Jair Bolsonaro.
A damning report reveals widespread mismanagement and inefficiencies within Atlanta's justice system, raising concerns over fairness and accountability.
A Minnesota judge faces scrutiny after shocking allegations of duct-taping a juvenile's mouth during a hearing. The incident has sparked outrage and an official investigation.
Former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi has levelled serious allegations of judicial misconduct against Judge James Boasberg, claiming bias in cases involving Donald Trump. The controversy escalates as legal experts weigh in.
A significant legal ruling in Canterbury has been reversed, sparking debates on judicial processes and local governance.
Federal Judge Aileen Cannon faces backlash after dismissing charges against Donald Trump, sparking accusations of bias and legal misconduct.
The US Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Kilmar Abrego-Garcia, a Mexican national, in a pivotal immigration case that could reshape deportation policies. The decision highlights judicial scrutiny over procedural fairness.
A Tennessee judge faces backlash after allegedly stating that Black individuals 'don’t know what justice is' during a heated courtroom exchange.
The British government is refusing to disclose the locations of hotels housing asylum seekers, citing security concerns. Critics argue the secrecy fuels public distrust.
In a landmark decision, Nashville has appointed its first Black judge to the Tennessee Supreme Court, marking a significant step towards diversity in the state's judiciary.
Defence Secretary Grant Shapps faces backlash after employing a superinjunction to suppress leaked documents on Afghanistan, sparking debates over transparency and government secrecy.
A former Philadelphia police officer has been sentenced and immediately paroled after being convicted in a high-profile traffic stop shooting incident. The case has sparked debates over police conduct and judicial leniency.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to review the nomination of Emil Bove, a prominent legal figure, sparking debates over judicial independence and political influence.
Shocking classified documents expose how the British government used legal gag orders to suppress damning revelations about its involvement in Afghanistan.
Defence Secretary Grant Shapps faces pressure to maintain a controversial superinjunction blocking details of UK military operations in Afghanistan. Critics question transparency.
Discover how superinjunctions are being used in the Afghan data breach case, their implications for press freedom, and why they remain controversial in UK law.
Former Defence Secretary Ben Wallace insists he has no regrets over a legal injunction that blocked media reporting on the airlift of 18,500 Afghans to Britain, despite a major data leak blunder.
A secret court order has blocked reporting on key details of the UK's Afghan resettlement scheme, raising concerns over transparency and accountability.
UK ministers have been gagged by a superinjunction preventing discussion of a covert airlift of Afghan migrants, raising questions over transparency and national security.