Kristi Noem Faces Scrutiny Over $143M No-Bid Contracts to Operative-Linked Firm
Noem Grilled Over $143M Contracts to Firm Tied to Spokesperson

Kristi Noem Faces Intense Congressional Grilling Over Questionable $143 Million Contracts

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has come under fierce scrutiny during two days of congressional hearings this week, with lawmakers from both parties demanding answers about $143 million in no-bid contracts awarded to a mysterious company with connections to her office. The controversy centers on taxpayer funds directed toward a firm that subcontracted with another business operated by the husband of Noem's former spokesperson.

Mysterious Company Awarded Contract Just Days After Formation

Records reveal that the Department of Homeland Security hired a little-known entity called Safe America Media to produce a marketing campaign prominently featuring Secretary Noem herself. The campaign included advertisements filmed during the government shutdown, with one memorable spot showing Noem on horseback in front of Mount Rushmore delivering tough immigration messaging. Astonishingly, Safe America Media was created just eleven days before receiving the lucrative $143 million contract.

During testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Noem admitted she doesn't know where the company is based, whether it had previously done government work, or how it ended up subcontracting with The Strategy Group. This subcontracting firm is operated by Ben Yoho, who is married to Noem's now-former assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin. McLaughlin left DHS last month but previously oversaw the Office of Public Affairs, which was listed as the funding office for these contracts.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Congressional Outrage Over Contracting Process

"You want the American people to believe that this is all above board?" Democratic Representative Joe Neguse challenged Noem during Wednesday's heated hearing. Republican Senator John Kennedy expressed similar concerns, stating, "It troubles me. A fifth to a quarter of a billion dollars in taxpayer money, when we're scratching for every penny... I just can't agree with it."

Democratic Senator Peter Welch highlighted that the government's spending website listed "urgency" as the justification for bypassing competitive bidding processes. Welch pressed Noem directly, asking, "As an administrator who has fiscal responsibility over a huge budget, do you realistically think that a company that was created 11 days before they got a $143 million contract is in a position to execute on that contract?"

Connections to Political Operations

Investigative reporting by ProPublica revealed that The Strategy Group played a significant role in Noem's 2022 North Dakota gubernatorial campaign, adding another layer of political connection to the contracting controversy. Noem did not dispute that Safe America Media hired The Strategy Group as a subcontractor, though she repeatedly denied personal involvement in the contracting process during her testimony.

The secretary did acknowledge that she evaluates any contract exceeding $5 million but claimed she lacks legal authority to investigate subcontractors. This defense did little to satisfy lawmakers, with Representative Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, accusing Noem of treating DHS funds "like a personal slush fund."

Defensive Responses and Recusals

When previously questioned about the contracting process, former assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin told ProPublica that DHS lacks "visibility" into subcontractor selections. McLaughlin emphasized, "I don't know who they're a subcontractor with, but I don't work with them because I have a conflict of interest and I fully recused myself. My marriage is one thing and work is another. I don't combine them."

Noem defended the advertising campaign's effectiveness during her testimony, though Senator Kennedy countered sharply that they were "effective in your name recognition" rather than necessarily serving public interests. The controversy emerges as DHS operates with a massive $108 billion annual budget, raising significant questions about oversight and accountability in government spending.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration