Michael Cohen Accuses Top Democrats of Coercing Testimony Against Trump
Cohen Claims Pressure from Bragg and James in Trump Trial

In a stunning new development, Michael Cohen, the former personal attorney and self-described 'fixer' for Donald Trump, has levelled explosive allegations against two senior Democratic legal figures. Cohen claims he was pressured and coerced into providing testimony that would help convict the former president.

From Star Witness to Accuser

Cohen served as a pivotal witness in the landmark 2024 criminal trial of Donald Trump in New York. That case resulted in Trump being found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, charges which stemmed from investigations into hush money payments. These payments, which Cohen facilitated, were made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former model Karen McDougal during the 2016 presidential election campaign.

Cohen's own legal troubles are well-documented; he was convicted in 2018 for his role in those same payments. His subsequent cooperation with authorities made him a central figure in the case against his former boss. However, his latest assertions cast a starkly different light on that cooperation.

Explosive Allegations of Pressure

In a bombshell essay published on his Substack platform on Friday, Cohen directly accused the offices of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and New York Attorney General Letitia James of improper conduct. He wrote that from his very first meetings with their lawyers, he felt compelled to toe the government's line.

'I felt pressured and coerced to only provide information and testimony that would satisfy the government’s desire to build the cases against and secure a judgment and convictions against President Trump,' Cohen stated. This allegation suggests the prosecutorial teams were not merely seeking the truth, but were singularly focused on securing a conviction, potentially undermining the perceived integrity of the historic trial's outcome.

Potential Repercussions and Fallout

These claims, if substantiated, could have significant ramifications. They are likely to be seized upon by Trump and his allies to bolster long-standing accusations of a politically motivated 'witch hunt'. The allegations could also fuel appeals and calls for investigations into the conduct of the prosecutors' offices involved.

For Michael Cohen, this public reversal adds another complex chapter to his journey from loyal insider to convicted felon, to star witness, and now to accuser of the very authorities he once assisted. The offices of Alvin Bragg and Letitia James have yet to publicly respond to these serious charges. As this is a breaking story, the legal and political consequences of Cohen's claims are only just beginning to unfold.