Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner is set to receive a significant financial windfall of approximately £30,000 after formally resigning from her long-held council position, in what critics are labelling a 'golden goodbye' payment.
The Council Departure
Rayner, who serves as MP for Ashton-under-Lyne, has officially stepped down from her role as a councillor for Stockport's Reddish South ward. This position had provided her with an annual allowance of around £15,000 while she simultaneously served as a Member of Parliament.
The resignation triggers a substantial severance package that could reach up to £30,000, calculated based on her years of service and current allowance rates. This payout comes despite Rayner continuing her parliamentary duties and receiving her MP's salary.
Timing and Transparency Questions
The departure has raised eyebrows among political opponents and transparency campaigners, particularly regarding the timing and circumstances. Some critics argue that such payments represent an unnecessary burden on taxpayers when politicians hold multiple public roles.
A Conservative Party spokesman commented: "While Angela Rayner lectures others on transparency and accountability, she's quietly lining her pockets with a golden goodbye that many taxpayers will find difficult to justify."
Rayner's Political Journey
Rayner has represented Reddish South since first being elected to Stockport Council, maintaining the position throughout her rise to become Labour's deputy leader. Her council role provided additional income alongside her parliamentary salary of £91,346.
- Elected as councillor for Reddish South ward
- Served while holding MP position since 2015
- Received approximately £15,000 annual council allowance
- Now eligible for severance based on length of service
Broader Implications
This situation highlights ongoing debates about politicians holding multiple public roles and the associated financial benefits. The substantial payout occurs amid continued scrutiny of second jobs and additional income streams for elected officials.
Rayner's office has defended the resignation as a necessary step to focus on her national political responsibilities, though the financial implications are likely to fuel further discussion about political accountability and public spending.
