Scottish rugby supporters are renewing calls for the lifting of the alcohol ban at Murrayfield during Six Nations matches, arguing that the prohibition is outdated and unfairly targets rugby fans. The ban, imposed under the Criminal Justice Act (Scotland) 1980, was originally introduced to curb violence at football matches but also applies to Scotland's national rugby stadium.
Fans point out that alcohol is available at Twickenham and the Millennium Stadium, giving those venues a competitive advantage. The Scottish Rugby Union (SRU), which faces debts of around £24 million, has been seeking an exemption for rugby fixtures, noting that recent events such as the 2005 Heineken Cup Final and Edinburgh games have passed without incident when alcohol was served.
Supporters argue that rugby crowds are generally well-behaved and that the ban is unnecessary. One fan commented: 'I have been a follower of rugby all my life, and have never known any trouble at a game.' Another added: 'Rugby fans are a more mature and responsible lot than football fans. We mix well and enjoy the craic.'
The SRU's financial difficulties have added urgency to the debate, with the possibility of selling off the famous back pitches at Murrayfield for development. Lifting the ban could boost match-day revenue and potentially increase attendance for friendlies, as some fans currently prefer to watch in pubs where they can drink.
Critics of the ban note that many fans already consume alcohol before matches or via hip flasks, making the prohibition ineffective. They argue that responsible drinking should be allowed, with stewards able to deal with any issues. The debate comes as Scotland prepares to face the All Blacks in the Rugby World Cup, with fans hoping for a change in policy.
