Hockey Coach Banned for Five Years After Shouting Complaints from Parents
Hockey Coach Banned After Parents Complain About Shouting

Hockey Coach Receives Five-Year Ban Following Parent Complaints

A children's hockey coach from Kent has expressed devastation after being banned from the sport for five years by England Hockey. The decision follows complaints from parents that he shouted excessively at young players, causing some to cry in the dugout.

Details of the Allegations and Ban

Duncan Parnis, a coach previously honoured as coach of the year, was suspended in June last year and formally banned in January after a hearing by England Hockey's Child Protection and Welfare Disciplinary panel. The panel concluded his actions posed a potential risk of harm to the welfare of young people in hockey, describing it as a permanent exclusion from affiliated activities involving those under 18.

Among the specific claims from 22 complainants are that Parnis belittled children's performances, shouted from the sideline, gave negative feedback, and made players cry after criticism. Seven witnesses, including two children, gave evidence at the hearing.

Support from the Hockey Community

However, many members of Knole Park Hockey Club in Sevenoaks, Kent, where Parnis has coached seven to 18-year-olds for six years, have defended him vigorously. They argue he has brought joy to the game and helped the club win 22 national titles in six years. Supporters point to over 100 emails of support, totalling 30,000 words, which they claim were largely ignored by the disciplinary panel.

Club members also highlight that Parnis has autism, suggesting this should inform understanding of his communication style. They describe the ban as grotesque and unfair, with some parents stating that if they had been aware of his autism, they might have been more sympathetic.

Coach's Response and Appeal Plans

Parnis, 41, who has coached around 10,000 people including at least ten Olympians, said he is devastated and emotionally struggling. He plans to appeal the decision and is taking legal action. He believes the complaints stem from a small group of disgruntled parents, often related to selection decisions, rather than genuine concerns about the children.

He explained that his autism affects his social interactions, such as not enjoying small talk or handshakes, but stressed he never intended to upset anyone. Parnis noted that all coaching sessions are conducted with another coach present for safety, and he has an open-door policy for observers, including past invitations to England Hockey.

Parental Perspectives on the Situation

Michael Brown, a parent and former professional cricketer, described Parnis as a fantastic coach focused on helping children fulfil their potential. He argued that constructive criticism is necessary for improvement, and some parents may have misunderstood this approach. Brown called the ban unfair and unjustified, suggesting better awareness of autism could have led to more supportive responses.

Another parent, Aynur Ates, a solicitor, expressed sadness and anger, labelling England Hockey's actions as cruel, discriminatory, and abusive. She praised Parnis for making hockey joyful and achieving rapid progress with players, emphasising that the children deserve better treatment.

Ongoing Process and Future Implications

Parnis reflected on the impact of the ban, noting that hockey was central to his life, with him coaching 60-70 hours weekly. He now feels lost without it, and the situation has taken a toll on his mental health. Despite this, he maintains he has always aimed to create a demanding yet enjoyable environment for players.

England Hockey has declined to comment, stating the process is ongoing. The case raises broader questions about coaching styles, autism awareness in sports, and disciplinary procedures in youth athletics.