In the turbulent landscape of modern American politics, a dangerous paradox is unfolding. The very norms and etiquette designed to protect democracy may be accelerating its decline.
The False Security of Political Decorum
For generations, American democracy operated on an unspoken agreement—a shared commitment to political decorum that maintained stability even during fierce disagreements. Today, that foundation is crumbling, yet many continue to cling to outdated rules of engagement.
The insistence on maintaining 'civil discourse' while facing opponents who openly reject democratic principles has created a profound vulnerability. When one side plays by traditional rules while the other operates without constraints, the playing field becomes dangerously uneven.
When Etiquette Becomes a Weapon
Political etiquette, once a safeguard, is now being weaponised against democracy itself. The expectation of 'civility' prevents forceful responses to existential threats, while procedural norms are exploited by those seeking to undermine the system from within.
This creates a situation where:
- Democratic institutions hesitate to use their full power against anti-democratic forces
- The media continues to provide 'balanced coverage' to fundamentally unbalanced positions
- Political leaders prioritise appearing 'reasonable' over protecting democratic foundations
The Urgent Need for New Rules
Democracy cannot be preserved through politeness alone. The threats facing American democratic institutions require a fundamental rethinking of how political engagement should work in an era where the rules themselves are contested.
This doesn't mean abandoning all norms, but rather recognising when traditional approaches become counterproductive. The defence of democracy may require measures that feel uncomfortable to those accustomed to political gentility.
A Wake-Up Call for Democratic Defenders
The greatest danger may be the failure to recognise that the game has changed. Continuing to operate as if political opponents share basic democratic commitments creates openings for those who would dismantle the system entirely.
As American democracy navigates its most challenging period in generations, the question isn't whether to be polite, but what kind of strength democracy requires to survive. The answer may determine whether democratic institutions can withstand the pressures they now face.
