The UK Government's approach to licensing arms exports to Israel has been deemed lawful in a significant ruling by the High Court. The case, which has drawn intense scrutiny, was brought forth by the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) and other Palestinian claimants.
They argued that the government should suspend export licences due to a supposed "clear risk" that UK-supplied equipment could be used in serious violations of international law during Israeli operations in Gaza.
A Judicial Green Light for Government Policy
In a detailed judgment, Lord Justice Lewis and Mr Justice Swift dismissed the application for a judicial review. The bench concluded that the ministers responsible had acted within their rights, following a rigorous and rational decision-making process when assessing the situation.
The judges noted that officials had examined a wide array of information from multiple sources, including advice from internal legal experts, before making their determinations on individual export licences.
Government Hails Court Decision
Shadow Defence Secretary John Healey had previously urged the government to publish its legal advice on the matter. However, following the verdict, a government spokesperson stated the ruling "vindicates our processes".
The judgment reinforces the UK's position that it operates one of the most robust arms export control regimes globally, with each application assessed on a strict, case-by-case basis against the consolidated criteria.
Campaigners Vow to Continue Fight
Despite the legal setback, the campaign groups involved have signalled their intention to persevere. A spokesperson for the claimants expressed disappointment and suggested that an appeal is being seriously considered, indicating that this may not be the final chapter in this contentious legal battle.
The ruling leaves the current policy intact, allowing arms exports to Israel to continue under the existing framework of risk assessment.
