Federal Judge Halts Deportation of 5-Year-Old Boy After Controversial ICE Arrest in Minnesota
Judge Blocks Deportation of Boy, 5, in Minnesota ICE Case

A federal judge has intervened to halt the removal of a five-year-old boy and his father from the United States, following a contentious immigration arrest in Minnesota that has reignited debate over border enforcement policies.

Temporary Protection Granted by Court

On Monday, US District Judge Fred Biery issued a temporary restraining order that prevents immigration authorities from deporting or transferring five-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his father, Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias, while their legal case proceeds through the judicial system. The order represents a significant legal development in a case that has attracted national attention and criticism.

Controversial Arrest Details Emerge

The father and son were taken into custody last week outside their family home in Minnesota during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation. The circumstances of the arrest have become particularly controversial, with neighbours and school officials alleging that immigration officers used the young boy as "bait" during the operation.

According to multiple accounts from the community, officers allegedly instructed Liam to knock on the front door of his home so that his mother would open it, facilitating the arrest of his father. These allegations have sparked outrage and protests in the local community, with demonstrators gathering under banners reading "ICE out of Minnesota" during recent protests.

Conflicting Accounts from Authorities

The Department of Homeland Security has strongly denied the allegations that the child was used as bait, describing the claim as an "abject lie" in official statements. Federal authorities maintain a different version of events, stating that Mr Arias fled on foot during the encounter, leaving his son unattended in a running vehicle parked in the driveway.

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller has publicly stated that Mr Arias entered the United States without proper documentation in December 2024. Federal authorities have confirmed that they consider Mr Arias to be in the country illegally, though they have not provided comprehensive details about his immigration status or history.

Legal Status and Current Detention

The family's legal representative, attorney Jennifer Scarborough, has indicated that Mr Arias has a pending asylum claim that could potentially provide a legal pathway for him to remain in the United States. This claim forms part of the ongoing legal proceedings that Judge Biery's order now protects while the courts examine the case.

Currently, both father and son are being held at a family detention facility in Dilley, Texas, where they await further developments in their legal situation. Attempts to obtain immediate comment from both the family's legal team and Department of Homeland Security representatives regarding the judge's ruling were unsuccessful at the time of reporting.

Broader Implications for Immigration Policy

This case has emerged as a focal point in the ongoing national conversation about immigration enforcement methods and border policies. The allegations surrounding the arrest tactics have raised serious questions about procedural standards during immigration operations involving families and children.

The judicial intervention represents a significant development in what has become a highly charged immigration case, with implications that extend beyond this individual family to broader questions about enforcement practices, due process, and the treatment of children within the immigration system.