Mandelson's US Ambassador Appointment Labelled 'Weirdly Rushed' in Newly Released Documents
National security adviser Jonathan Powell described Lord Peter Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador as 'weirdly rushed' following his sacking, according to recently disclosed government files. This sentiment was echoed by then-Foreign Office permanent under-secretary Philip Barton, highlighting internal unease within the highest echelons of British diplomacy.
Security Concerns and Epstein Connections Raised Prior to Appointment
The files indicate that Sir Keir Starmer was cautioned about a 'general reputational risk' regarding Lord Mandelson's relationship with convicted paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein before his Washington role was confirmed. A due diligence document, prepared in December 2024 prior to Lord Mandelson's appointment, specifically noted reports detailing his connections to Epstein, raising red flags about potential security and ethical implications.
Dismissal and Financial Aftermath
Lord Mandelson was sacked from his position as US ambassador during a conversation with the Prime Minister's general counsel, a move that followed the mounting concerns over his suitability for the role. In the aftermath of his dismissal, Lord Mandelson had requested a payoff exceeding £500,000 but ultimately received only £75,000, underscoring the contentious nature of his departure and the government's reluctance to provide a substantial settlement.
The revelations from these files shed light on the rushed and controversial nature of Mandelson's appointment, exposing deeper issues of vetting and accountability in high-level diplomatic postings. The episode has sparked renewed scrutiny over how such critical roles are filled and the due diligence processes in place to safeguard national interests.
