Trump’s Controversial Election Rule Proposal: Could It Change the US Constitution?
Trump’s Election Rule Proposal Sparks Constitutional Debate

Former US President Donald Trump has ignited fresh controversy by proposing a significant overhaul of American election rules—a move that critics argue could undermine the US Constitution.

Trump’s Bold Suggestion

In a recent statement, Trump suggested that the US should adopt a rule allowing presidential candidates to remain in office indefinitely if they win elections by a substantial margin. This idea, which echoes his long-standing grievances about the 2020 election results, has drawn sharp criticism from legal experts and political opponents.

Constitutional Concerns

Legal scholars have been quick to point out that such a change would require a constitutional amendment—a process that is deliberately difficult to prevent arbitrary alterations to the country’s foundational laws. The US Constitution currently limits presidents to two four-year terms, a safeguard established after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s unprecedented four-term presidency.

Political Reactions

Democrats and some Republicans have condemned Trump’s proposal as undemocratic. "This is exactly the kind of rhetoric that erodes trust in our electoral system," said one senior Democratic lawmaker. Meanwhile, Trump’s supporters argue that he is merely advocating for "fairer" elections.

What Happens Next?

While Trump’s suggestion is unlikely to gain serious traction in Congress, it has reignited debates about election integrity and the balance of power in the US. As the 2024 election approaches, such discussions are expected to intensify.