In a powerful defence of Britain's legal system, former Prime Minister Theresa May has issued a stark warning against the growing trend of politicians attacking judges and undermining judicial independence.
Constitutional Principles Under Threat
The Conservative stalwart used a significant speech to highlight the dangerous precedent being set by political figures who publicly criticise court rulings they disagree with. Mrs May emphasised that such behaviour threatens the very foundations of Britain's constitutional settlement.
"An independent judiciary is the cornerstone of the rule of law," the former PM declared, adding that "when politicians criticise the judges, they criticise the rule of law itself."
Jenrick's Comments Spark Concern
Mrs May's intervention comes amid growing concern about comments from senior Conservative figures, including former immigration minister Robert Jenrick. Mr Jenrick had previously suggested that judges were effectively "legislating from the bench" through their interpretation of human rights laws in immigration cases.
The ex-PM directly addressed these concerns, stating that while parliament has the right to change laws, it must respect the judiciary's role in interpreting them. She warned that blurring these constitutional lines risks creating a dangerous politicisation of Britain's courts.
Defending the Separation of Powers
Mrs May's speech served as a robust defence of the separation of powers doctrine, which ensures that the executive, legislature and judiciary maintain their distinct roles within Britain's unwritten constitution.
Key points from her address included:
- Judges must be free to make decisions without political pressure
- Politicians should respect court rulings even when they disagree
- The proper channel for change is through parliamentary legislation
- Public confidence in the justice system depends on judicial independence
A Growing Constitutional Battle
The tension between government and judiciary has been escalating in recent years, particularly around immigration and human rights cases. Mrs May's warning signals deep concern within the Conservative party about the direction of this debate.
Her intervention places her at odds with some colleagues who advocate for a more confrontational approach towards the courts, especially regarding the European Convention on Human Rights and its application in UK law.
As the debate over Britain's constitutional future continues, Mrs May's speech serves as a timely reminder of the delicate balance that underpins the nation's democratic institutions and the importance of preserving judicial independence for generations to come.
