Trump Backs RFK Jr.'s Baseless Autism-Vaccine Claim, Alarming Medical Experts
Trump backs RFK Jr.'s debunked autism-vaccine claim

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the public health community, former US President Donald Trump has publicly amplified the long-discredited anti-vaccine rhetoric of presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

During a joint appearance, Trump endorsed Kennedy's bizarre and unfounded theory that suggests a combination of acetaminophen (known as paracetamol in the UK) and vaccinations can cause autism in children. This claim has been thoroughly debunked by decades of extensive scientific research.

A Dangerous Alliance

The alliance between Trump and Kennedy, once political rivals, now centres on spreading vaccine scepticism. Kennedy, a prominent figure in the anti-vaccine movement, has built his campaign on misinformation that contradicts established medical science.

Trump's endorsement lends a powerful platform to these dangerous falsehoods. His statement, "He's right about that," in response to Kennedy's theory, is being condemned by doctors and scientists who warn it could erode public trust in vital immunisation programmes.

The Scientific Consensus

Major health bodies worldwide, including the NHS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the World Health Organisation (WHO), have consistently affirmed the safety of vaccines. Numerous large-scale studies involving millions of children have found no link between vaccines—or their components—and autism spectrum disorder.

The theory regarding acetaminophen is similarly without credible scientific foundation. Medical experts stress that the real danger lies in the preventable diseases that can resurge when vaccination rates fall.

Political Motives vs. Public Health

Analysts suggest this collaboration is a strategic political manoeuvre. By embracing Kennedy's controversial stance, Trump may be attempting to appeal to a fringe element of the electorate, despite the profound public health risks involved.

This incident raises serious concerns about the impact of political rhetoric on scientific integrity and the well-being of populations, both in the United States and beyond.