In a striking critique that challenges the very foundations of modern activism, prominent psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert has declared that today's protest movements suffer from a critical absence of strong leadership, comparing them to kingdoms without kings.
The Psychology Behind Modern Dissent
Alpert, whose Manhattan practice has attracted high-profile clients from various sectors, argues that the current protest landscape lacks the strategic direction and clear messaging that characterised successful historical movements. "What we're witnessing," he explains, "is often emotional outpouring without the structural framework necessary for tangible results."
The Leadership Vacuum in Contemporary Activism
The psychotherapist identifies several key issues plaguing modern demonstrations:
- Fragmented messaging that dilutes the core message
- Absence of identifiable leadership to negotiate with authorities
- Lack of clear strategic objectives beyond initial outrage
- Emotional reactivity overriding thoughtful planning
Historical Context: What Made Past Movements Successful?
Alpert draws compelling comparisons to historical figures who provided the strong leadership necessary for social change. "Think of Martin Luther King Jr., Gandhi, or Nelson Mandela," he notes. "These were individuals who could articulate clear visions, negotiate with power structures, and maintain discipline within their movements."
The absence of such figures in today's protests, according to Alpert, creates movements that are more cathartic than constructive. "People feel good about expressing their anger, but without strategic direction, that energy dissipates without creating lasting change."
The Psychological Impact on Participants
From a mental health perspective, Alpert warns that participation in poorly organised protests can actually be detrimental to activists' wellbeing. "When people invest emotional energy in causes that yield no tangible results, it can lead to activist burnout, cynicism, and disillusionment with the entire concept of social change."
A Call for More Strategic Activism
Alpert isn't suggesting that people should stop protesting. Rather, he advocates for a more thoughtful approach to social change:
- Identify clear, achievable objectives before taking to the streets
- Develop coherent leadership structures capable of negotiation
- Create sustainable strategies beyond one-off demonstrations
- Focus on building coalitions rather than simply expressing outrage
His message serves as both a critique and a challenge to a new generation of activists: the causes may be just, but without the kings to lead them, these modern protests risk becoming castles built on sand.
