Sir Keir Starmer and Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves are facing mounting criticism over Labour's controversial proposal to means-test winter fuel payments for pensioners, a move that would strip millions of elderly households of crucial energy bill support.
The party leadership has defended the plan, arguing it represents a "tough but necessary decision" to target support toward those most in need during the cost-of-living crisis. Under the proposal, only pensioners receiving pension credit would qualify for the annual payment, which currently provides between £100 and £300 to help cover winter heating costs.
Charity organisations have reacted with alarm, warning that the move could have devastating consequences for vulnerable elderly people. Age UK expressed "deep concern" that those just above the benefits threshold would be left struggling to heat their homes adequately during the coldest months.
Conservative Counterattack
The Conservative Party has seized on the proposal, with Work and Pensions Secretary Mel Stride accusing Labour of "turning their backs on pensioners who have worked hard all their lives." The Tories have positioned themselves as defenders of the universal benefit, despite having frozen the payment levels for several years.
Rachel Reeves countered criticism by emphasising Labour's commitment to fiscal responsibility, stating: "We have to be honest with the British public about the tough choices facing the next government. This is about ensuring support goes to those who need it most."
Pensioner Poverty Concerns
Experts warn that the policy could push more pensioners into fuel poverty, with many older people already facing the difficult choice between heating and eating. The proposal has sparked particular concern in regions with older housing stock and poorer insulation, where energy costs are typically higher.
Sir Keir Starmer maintained that the move was part of a broader responsible economic approach, telling reporters: "We will always protect the most vulnerable, but we must also be mindful of the taxpayer."
The controversy comes as both major parties position themselves on welfare spending ahead of the next general election, with the winter fuel payment becoming an unexpected battleground in the debate over austerity versus universal benefits.
