Why Not Put Solar Panels Over Car Parks Instead of Green Spaces?
Solar Panels Over Car Parks vs Green Spaces: Reader Debate

Readers Question Why Solar Farms Occupy Green Spaces Instead of Car Parks

A recent discussion in The Guardian's Notes and Queries series has sparked a lively debate among readers about the placement of solar panels. Chris from Middlesbrough asked: "Why do we build solar farms over green space, when we could just put them over massive car parks?" The question references a popular internet meme suggesting that solar panels should be installed over large parking lots rather than on undeveloped land.

Arguments for Solar Panels on Car Parks

Many readers supported the idea of installing solar panels on car parks. DrBlamm0 proposed mandating that data centres put solar panels on their roofs, and suggested adding panels to all new structures. wyldfam noted that in France, planning requirements now include solar panels on car parks, providing shade for cars while generating electricity to recharge them. LeroyB argued that car parks, warehouses, leisure centres, and motorways should all be covered with solar panels and wind turbines, stating: "Stop talking about it and do it!"

Counterarguments: Cost and Grid Balance

However, several readers pointed out practical challenges. Person123456789 explained that for national-level electricity generation, large installations are easier for the National Energy System Operator (NESO) to manage than numerous smaller ones. pavanne highlighted that solar panels on car parks cost more due to additional steel and wind load resistance, and that ground-mount solar remains the cheapest source of new electricity. imperialforce added that the amount of farmland used by solar farms is negligible, and that arguments for alternative locations often serve as excuses to block development.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Both Approaches Can Coexist

Many contributors emphasised that the choice is not binary. MaynardSmithFan stated: "This is a false dichotomy – car park and greenfield are not mutually exclusive. We should do both." imperialforce agreed, encouraging local generation on car parks while maintaining large-scale solar farms for grid stability. Secret_squirrel29 pointed out that golf courses use five to six times more land than solar farms, questioning why farmland protection is selectively applied.

Policy Examples from France and the UK

France has already legislated that car parks must include solar panels, making it a planning requirement. In the UK, Randomusername222 noted that from 2028, 40% of the roof area of new homes in England must be covered with solar panels. Dorkalicious humorously suggested that members of the royal family should be buried beneath car parks, as was done with Richard III, to advance planning reforms.

Innovative Alternatives: Floatovoltaics and More

Stoichenens proposed floating solar panels on reservoirs to reduce evaporation and provide green electricity. Lovecars highlighted that China is the global leader in "floatovoltaics," with solar panels installed above rivers and open water. GardnerJoe criticised the lack of coordination between communities and industry, urging that data centres be required to include closed cooling and power systems to generate their own energy and reuse water.

Conclusion: A Call for Comprehensive Action

The debate underscores that multiple strategies are needed to expand solar energy. While car parks offer untapped potential, large-scale solar farms remain essential for cost-effective national generation. Readers called for coordinated planning, policy mandates, and innovative solutions to balance energy needs with land use. As Stuart_Dixon concluded: "You only get one go at finding a happy place."

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration