ITV News reporter Lucy Watson has found herself at the centre of a social media storm following what viewers are calling a "jaw-dropping" and "aggressive" line of questioning directed at Foreign Secretary Lord David Cameron.
The tense exchange, which occurred during a press briefing on the UK's stance regarding Israel and Gaza, saw Watson repeatedly challenge Cameron on British arms sales to Israel. The Foreign Secretary had been outlining the government's position when the interview took a confrontational turn.
'Incredibly Aggressive' Approach Sparks Backlash
Social media users were quick to react to the interview, with many expressing shock at Watson's approach. One viewer commented on X (formerly Twitter): "The ITV reporter's line of questioning to David Cameron was incredibly aggressive and disrespectful."
Another added: "This is not how you conduct an interview with a former Prime Minister and current Foreign Secretary. The lack of professionalism is staggering."
Cameron Maintains Composure Under Pressure
Despite the intense grilling, Lord Cameron remained composed throughout the exchange, carefully addressing questions about UK military exports and humanitarian concerns in Gaza. The Foreign Secretary emphasised the government's careful assessment procedures regarding arms sales while acknowledging the complex nature of the conflict.
Watson pressed further, asking: "But how can you say you're not backing down when you're continuing to arm Israel?" to which Cameron responded with detailed explanations of the government's decision-making process.
Divided Opinions on Journalistic Approach
While many criticised Watson's approach, others came to her defence, arguing that tough questioning of government officials is essential for accountability. Supporters suggested that the Foreign Secretary should expect rigorous scrutiny on such a sensitive and important international issue.
The debate continues to rage online about the appropriate tone for political interviews and whether Watson's style crossed the line from assertive to inappropriate when addressing a senior statesman.
