Wolf Hall vs The Cleopatras: The Best and Worst Historical TV Epics Ranked
Best and Worst Historical TV Epics Ranked

Historical dramas have long been a staple of British television, offering everything from meticulously researched period pieces to wildly inaccurate but entertaining spectacles. Here, we take a look at the best and worst historical TV epics, from the critically acclaimed Wolf Hall to the infamous The Cleopatras.

The Best: Wolf Hall

Adapted from Hilary Mantel's Booker Prize-winning novels, Wolf Hall is a masterclass in historical storytelling. Mark Rylance's portrayal of Thomas Cromwell is nothing short of mesmerizing, capturing the political intrigue of Henry VIII's court with subtlety and depth. The production design and cinematography are equally stunning, transporting viewers straight to the 16th century.

The Worst: The Cleopatras

On the other end of the spectrum lies The Cleopatras, a 1983 BBC series that has become synonymous with historical inaccuracy and over-the-top performances. While it aimed to chronicle the Ptolemaic dynasty, the show's campy tone and questionable costumes made it more of a guilty pleasure than a serious drama.

Honourable Mentions

  • I, Claudius: This 1976 series remains a benchmark for historical drama, with Derek Jacobi delivering a legendary performance as the stammering emperor.
  • The Tudors: While not always accurate, its lavish production and charismatic cast made it a hit.
  • Rome: HBO's epic brought ancient Rome to life with unparalleled scale and detail.

Whether you're a history buff or just love a good costume drama, there's something for everyone in the world of historical TV epics.