New MOT testing rules come into effect from July 6, impacting three groups of drivers: owners of HGVs, trailers, and buses or coaches. The Department for Transport (DfT) has confirmed increases to the maximum service charge for these vehicle tests, marking the first such rise since 2010.
What Are the New Charges?
The maximum service charge for HGVs will rise from £55 to £70, an increase of £15. For trailers, the charge goes up from £40 to £50, a £10 rise. Buses and coaches will see the highest jump, from £70 to £90, an increase of £20. These changes take effect from July 6.
The DfT stated that the updates aim to help authorised testing facilities (ATFs) cover rising operational costs and plan for future equipment needs, ensuring the testing network remains sustainable. The department emphasised that the actual increase is smaller than inflation over the past 16 years, noting, "We believe raising the maximum HGV test service charge by £15 (a maximum 9% increase in overall costs for vehicle operators if ATFs charge the full amount) is appropriate. This increase is less than inflation over the same period, which would have seen an increase of approximately £30."
Impact on Car Owners
Car owners are unaffected by these changes. The maximum MOT test charge for cars remains at £54.85, unchanged since 2010.
Industry Reactions
The Road Haulage Association (RHA) acknowledged that a modest increase in the cap could encourage new ATFs to enter the market, particularly benefiting underserved areas. However, the RHA also warned that the higher charges add cost pressure on operators already facing financial strain. "It's the first proposed change to these charges since 2010, and it's already sparking debate across the sector. At the RHA, we believe it's vital to consider all perspectives, balancing the sustainability of Authorised Testing Facilities (ATFs) with the financial pressures faced by operators," the RHA said.
The RHA further noted that rising energy prices, rent, and salaries have made it difficult for many testing facilities to remain economically viable. Smaller firms operating with narrow profit margins are expected to feel the effects "more acutely" than larger operators.
