New South Wales Planning Minister Paul Scully has ignited a political firestorm after making controversial remarks about residents who oppose new housing developments, labelling them "un-Sydneylike" in what critics are calling a dismissive attack on community concerns.
The minister's comments came during a tense press conference where he defended the government's ambitious housing targets, suggesting that resistance to new developments goes against Sydney's character as a welcoming, growing city.
Minister Defends Controversial Stance
Mr Scully stood by his comments when questioned by journalists, arguing that Sydney must embrace growth and development to address the critical housing shortage. "We need to have a conversation about what makes us Sydneylike," he stated, emphasising the need for increased housing supply across the city.
The minister's remarks have drawn immediate criticism from community groups and opposition politicians who accuse him of belittling legitimate concerns about infrastructure, overcrowding, and environmental impacts.
Growing Backlash From Communities
Resident action groups and local councils have expressed outrage at the characterisation of their objections as "un-Sydneylike." Many argue that their concerns are rooted in practical considerations rather than resistance to growth.
"This isn't about being against development," said one community representative. "It's about ensuring that growth is managed responsibly with proper infrastructure, green spaces, and community facilities."
Political Fallout Intensifies
Opposition leaders have seized on the comments, accusing the minister of being out of touch with community concerns. Shadow Planning Minister Scott Farlow condemned the remarks as "arrogant" and "dismissive" of residents' valid worries about overdevelopment.
The controversy comes as the NSW government pushes forward with aggressive housing targets, aiming to address the state's severe housing affordability crisis through increased construction across Sydney's metropolitan areas.
As the debate continues, both sides remain entrenched in their positions, with the minister's choice of words adding fuel to an already heated discussion about Sydney's future development and character.
